February 
            17, 2001
         
         
        
       
       
        
         
          Nagging 
            Math Mysteries
         
         
         by Pearl Tesler
        
       
       
        
         The 
            best part about going to conferences like AAAS is that you really 
            never know what you're going to get. Sure, there are the session titles, 
            but invariably these, like horoscopes, have been broadly crafted to 
            apply to a full range of possibilities.
        
       
       
        
         Take 
            "New Tests for Science". You could show up at this one expecting 
            just about anything. Maybe there's literally a new test, something 
            like a geeks' breathalyzer. Or maybe Science as a whole is facing 
            a grave new challenge, like dissolution of the National Science Foundation, 
            funder of all great and small. Or maybe they've isolated a science 
            gene, using samples of Einstein's preserved brain.
        
       
       
        
         It was 
            in this "don't know what it is but it sounds good" spirit that I showed 
            up at "The Nature and Origins of Mathematical Thought." 
            Memorable gleanings related to this stated topic are nil. However, 
            thanks to a few tangential asides, not one but two math mysteries 
            that have dogged my daysand perhaps yours?were finally 
            solved.
        
       
       
        
         
          Mystery 
            #1: Why is it that a negative number times a negative number is a 
            positive number?
         
         Now, there is some logic to the fact that a negative 
            times a positive is negative. You can think of (-5) x 2 as two negative 
            fives, which add up to negative ten. But a negative times a negative?
        
       
       
         
        
        
         
          Math 
            Mystery #1
         
        
       
       
        
         The 
            "aha" comes when you think of these numbers on a number 
            line. Multiplication by a negative number is like a 180° rotation 
            about the origin. So if you were pointing in the positive direction, 
            multiplication by a negative "flips" you, so now you point in the 
            negative direction. So if you're already negative, multiplication 
            by another negative number flips you 180°, back to positive. Two 
            negative multipliers are like a full 360° rotation, putting you 
            right back where you started.
        
       
       
        
         
          Mystery 
            #2: Where did imaginary numbers come from, and why do we graph them 
            on the vertical axis?
         
         This is one of those dogmas that gets handed 
            to you in trig. The square root of 1 is 1, and the square root of 
            -1 is i, an imaginary number. You put real numbers on the horizontal 
            number line, and you put the imaginary numbers on a vertical axis.
        
       
       
         
        
        
         
          Math 
            Mystery #2
         
        
       
       
        
         The 
            plain truth is, they thought up i because they needed an answer to 
            the question "What is the square root of -1?" But it begins to make 
            some sense if you return to the idea that multiplication by -1 is 
            a 180° rotation about the origin. By this logic, the square root 
            of -1 (i) would have to be a 90° rotation. Where does that put 
            you? Sticking straight up out of the origin. This is the imaginary 
            dimension.
        
       
       
        
         Both 
            these insights come courtesy of George Lakoff and Rafael Nunez, co-authors 
            of "Where Mathematics Comes From," a book on math cognition 
            that seems to be about to become a national bestseller. Their premise 
            is that all math has bases in the logic of the physical world. One 
            simple example is the idea that more is "up" and less is "down." For 
            example, prices "rise" and supplies "drop." Says Lakoff, "In no language 
            in the world is this convention reversed." The idea is that math concepts 
            like more and less tie directly to physical realities, for example, 
            the level of water in a jug. Haven't read it yet, but it could be 
            a cure for yet more nagging math mysteries.